Posts Tagged ‘Court’
Question by ☼Solar☼: 27 States challenging the constitutionality of health care law in court?
The following states are challenging the constitutionality of the health care law in federal court: Florida, South Carolina, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, Louisiana, Alabama, Colorado, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Washington, Idaho, South Dakota, Indiana, North Dakota, Mississippi, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, Alaska, Ohio, Wisconsin, Maine, Iowa, Wyoming, Kansas and Virginia.
How much resources from the local state will taxpayers pay to the lawyers and win or lose; could the monies do better with other local projects?
Answer by wrfine
Give your answer to this question below!
Question by Steve: If the Supreme Court rules that Obamacare is Constitutional, what will happen when the states?
that have so far refused to more forward on creating their health insurance exchanges, request more time to create them? They’re going to say that they didn’t have enough time between the ruling, and the January 1, 2014 deadline to create the exchanges.
Should they be given extra time, or should they be told “too bad, so sad”?
Answer by Liberals Are Weak
Court will not hold it up
But in any cause if the Republicans win the senate in 2013 (23 Dems up for re-election) than they can use the same procedure “reconciliation” to kill Obamacare that Reid used to implement it. Killing the filibuster and require only 51 votes. They can also block appointments and funding
And if a Republican wins the Presidency he or she can use the same president that Obama created by giving a blanket voucher of exemption to all that asks for 99 years DOne and Done
What do you think? Answer below!
Incoming search terms:
- FACT CHECK ORG / SUPREME COURT TO HOLD NEW HEARINGS ON OBAMA CARE
- Supreme court obamacare constitutional
(Reuters) – The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide whether human genes can be patented, a hotly contested issue with broad consequences for the future of gene-based medicine.
OKLAHOMA CITY (Reuters) – A federal judge on Monday denied a legal challenge to President Barack Obama’s signature health reforms, ruling that the owners of a $ 3 billion arts and crafts chain must provide emergency contraceptives in their group health care plan.
Incoming search terms:
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – A federal appeals court panel on Monday sharply questioned lawyers defending an Arizona law that bans late-term abortions starting at 20 weeks of pregnancy except in medical emergencies, which opponents say is the toughest in the United States.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Supreme Court will soon consider whether police must get a warrant before forcing a suspected drunken driver to submit to a blood test, a case that could set a new legal standard for motorists’ privacy.
Romney and Obama court Florida Hispanics Story from: www.guardian.co.uk Image Attribution: Emmanuel Dunand/AFP/Getty Images White House rivals visit Florida to speak on Spanish-language TV in effort to address key concerns of diverse Latino electorateAs if his week needed to become any more challenging Mitt Romney will appear in Miami on Wednesday to face some tough questions from a key group of voters crucial to his hopes of winning the White House ” Florida’s Hispanics.The Republican presidential candidate already in trouble for his “it would be helpful to be a Latino” comment recorded at a Florida fundraising dinner goes into an interview with the Spanish-language TV station Univision seeking to explain and defend his controversial policies on immigration and healthcare.Barack Obama meanwhile follows Romney to south Florida for his own appearance before the same cameras on Thursday. And while Obama enjoys a margin of popularity among Florida’s 2.1 million Hispanic electors 51% to 37% according to the latest polls analysts say the vote could yet tip either way.”It’s hard to win the presidency and not win in Florida and it’s hard to win in Florida without winning the Hispanic vote” said Casey Klofstad associate professor of political science at the University of Miami and an analyst for the polling group Latino Decisions.”The campaign is more about turnout than changing hearts and minds. The candidates need to court their base and go to where the votes are. The Latino …
Incoming search terms:
NEW DELHI (Reuters) – Swiss drugmaker Novartis told India’s top court it had demonstrated the improved efficacy of its cancer drug Glivec as the final hearing began on Tuesday of a patent case that could change the rules for the country’s healthcare sector.
The Supreme Court reviewing of health-care law with Walter Dellinger of Duke University, Richard Epstein of University of Chicago Law School, Jeffrey Toobin of the New Yorker, and Stuart Taylor of the Brookings Institution || Lowell Bergman of Frontline on “Murdoch’s Scandal”
This product is manufactured on demand using DVD-R recordable media. Amazon.com’s standard return policy will apply.
List Price: $ 24.95
Price: $ 24.95
“There is something bad happening to our children in family courts today that is causing them more harm than drugs, more harm than crime and even more harm than child molestation”. – Judge Watson L. White, Superior Court Judge, Georgia “There is no system ever devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or father, mother and child apart so bitterly than our present Family Court System.” – Judge Brian Lindsay, Retired Supreme Court Judge, New York Violations of Federal Law on Judicial Determinations: -Violation CFR Sec 1356.21(d): Documentation of Judicial Determinations (Must be supported by EXPLICIT evidence) (1) The judicial determinations regarding contrary to the welfare, reasonable efforts to prevent removal, and reasonable efforts to finalize the permanency plan in effect, including judicial determinations that reasonable efforts are not required, must be explicitly documented and must be made on a case-by-case basis and so stated in the court order. (2) Neither affidavits nor nunc pro tunc orders will be accepted as verification documentation in support of reasonable efforts and contrary to the welfare judicial determinations. (3) Court orders that reference State law to substantiate judicial determinations are NOT acceptable, even if State law provides that a removal must be based on a judicial determination that remaining in the home would be contrary to the child’s welfare or that removal can only be ordered after reasonable efforts have been …
Video Rating: 5 / 5