A simple definition…
What are the pros and cons of President Obama having passed this bill?
Popular Posts:
- Medicare Tax? Health Care for the Elderly? Let’s look at the facts about the proposed Medicare Tax … and a medical care program for the aged that already exists! What’s the hurry here? The supporters of the proposed Medicare Tax would have you believe that passage of this controversial bill is urgent … that persons over 5 are deprived of needed medical care because they can’t pay for it. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Kerr-Mills Law, passed by Congress in 1960 – enabled individual states to guarantee to every elderly person who needs help the health care he or she requires. We call this health program … Health Opportunity for the Elderly. Thousands of people every day are being helped by its generous benefits. And unlike Medicare, which would substantially increase your Social Security Tax payroll deductions, existing programs are being paid for now by a part of your present tax dollar! Medicare? NO. Health Care for the Elderly? YES! ….. 1964 American Medical Association Ad, A5157.
- H.R. 3590 – The Health Care Reform Bill as passed on March 21, 2010 — Complete text signed by President Barack Obama (also known as “Health Reform” and … Act 2009 / 2010″) 2,409 pages — Searchable
- What does this new health care law mean for uninsured people who need coverage?
- Mississippi leaders hold health care forum
- Know the TRUTH about the Government Health Care Bill HR3200 – Key Points
Incoming search terms:
- define health care reform bill
- define health care reform
- health care reform bill definition
- definition of the health care reform bill
- meaning of the healthcare reform bill
- define health care reform act
- health care reform bill define
- definition of health care reform bill
- define healthcare reform
- divinitude define as used in the obama health bill
It is a scam. Obama is a Pro at scamming people and is a con artist.
Makes healthcare more available to everyone by lowering costs to the individual. In turn means that hospitals and clinics will be filled with patients constantly. Lowers profit to doctors, so there will be less of them to address the increased number. Flip side to that is the people who become doctors will do it for the right reason, to help people, rather than the wrong reason which is to make money. Doctors will still have over a six figure income, they won’t hurt financially like some people say. There’s more to it, but this is going to be some of the results of this bill. I think it’s a good thing. Many other countries have similar health care plans and it works well for them. I think it’s long over due that we get universal healthcare. One thing I disagree with is the penalty to those without healthcare.
Alas, no one can. I don’t even know if they are finished making it up yet.
It was just a piece of paper that that idiot Pelosi and her fool in kind Reed, made up and got signed for the president because he wanted to add that to his “list of achievement”.. Ha.. just another fool trick on Americans. We will pay into it for 4 years before we can even use it.. by then obama will be long gone and so will our money.. Count on it!
Yes, reform to help Americans and not the (un)insurance companies who used death panels to screw America.
I am always amazed how many Americans seem not to be aware about the real healthcare issues relying instead on FOX and other sources to spread lies about the healthcare system of the USA and those abroad. I mean, if healthcare in nations with universal coverage is so bad, why do they keep it?
Obama wants to make insurance more available to all and change the system so that it gives the American people value for money [1]. He also wants change so that the insurance companies find it harder to get out of paying for treatment. The system he is proposing looks similar to that which works in Taiwan where private companies are involved in providing healthcare [2].
Obama campaigned on reforming the healthcare system. He said he wanted to make insurance more available and he was elected to do this [3].
FACT – the US has higher death rates for kids both for kids aged under one and those under five than western European countries with universal health coverage [4].
FACT – American insurance companies push up prices and work to stop paying out claims on those they cover [5].
FACT – the USA spends more on healthcare PER PERSON than any other nation on the planet [6].
That means that a dead American four year old would have had a better chance of life if they were born in any western nation with universal health coverage.
If you do not like the policies that Obama was elected to bring in, he can always be voted out of office in 2012. But if you disagree with the facts, please let me know. I am always willing to learn, but please provide proof. None of those who disagree with me have been able to do that so far.
Here is the bill: http://docs.house.gov/rules/health/111_ahcaa.pdf . Make your own assumptions and opinions on it. The only information you are going to get here are bias remarks from the left and right.